fbpx Skip to Content

Hawkish politicians speak as though we are living on the precipice of WWIII. But the data tells a less alarmist story

Fewer Soldiers and Fewer War Deaths

By Chelsea Follett @Chellivia

This week, 101 years ago, a young Canadian artillery officer named John McCrae wrote the iconic war poem, In Flanders Fields. Following the death of a friend and fellow soldier in World War I, the author wrote, in part,

In Flanders fields the poppies blow

Between the crosses, row on row,

That mark our place; and in the sky

The larks, still bravely singing, fly

Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago

We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,

Loved and were loved, and now we lie

In Flanders fields.

Today, those words remain a poignant reminder of the tragedy of death in battle. Hawkish politicians, like New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, often speak as though we are living on the precipice of a third world war. But the data tells a less alarmist story.

While war deaths are certainly more visible than ever, with television and the Internet bringing scenes of flag-draped coffins into our living rooms, far fewer people ever see battle firsthand. After adjusting for population growth, the data shows that despite the noted exception of the World Wars, battle deaths have become rarer since 1900.

In fact, today there are fewer military personnel as a share of the population than at any time since 1932. The world may seem chaotic, but the data shows a more optimistic story.

Chelsea Follett is the managing editor of HumanProgress.org and a policy analyst in the Cato Institute’s Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity.


AI Is Helping to ID Victims in Holocaust Photos


Ethiopia and Tigray Forces Agree to Truce in Calamitous Civil War


Halloween: More Walking Dead, Fewer Dead Walkers


Iranians Could Have Internet Freedom—If the U.N. Got Out of the Way


Talking to Whales: Can AI Bridge the Chasm Between Humans and Other Animals?


Heroes of Progress, Pt. 52: Yuan Longping